Concrete formulations rather than abstract ones: Often, abstract formulations are not helpful to the reader. Where possible, concrete descriptions should always be used.
Not: “Our prediction is to be able to increase the performance of software systems.”
But, “with our model-based performance prediction method, we are able to increase the response times of component-based software architectures during runtime by 10%.”
I / We / Man / Passive: The question in which persona conference paper should be written is arguable. The “passive” form veils the acting person, is in English rather unpopular and should be avoided in scientific work. The use of “man” entices too much to flatter. The “I” form does not fit into conference papers written by several authors http://idealthesis.com.
Remains the “we” form, to emphasize the embedding of the author into a group. But beware: the “we” should only be used in English if the author is actually the subject of the sentence (). Often it is used by lazy authors who are not clear about the right subject.
Not: “In this paper, we show Bla Bla,” but “This paper shows Bla Bla.”
Not: “We use Petri-nets to model blah” but “Our approach uses Petri-nets to blah.”
Correct: “We have implemented tools to Bla Bla.” (Emphasizes that the authors actually did this by hand)
Closure: papers should be “self-contained,” i.e. All important information must be extracted from the article without the need to add other articles apexessays.com.
No strong statements / superlatives: Authors of conference papers should be careful with overly formulated statements or excessive formulations. These are seldom received positively by reviewers, but usually achieve the opposite, because they provoke reviewers to look for arguments against these statements. Negative examples:
“This approach is very challenging …”: Why does this have to be exposed? If the approach was not challenging, one would not be concerned with it.
“Just because you do not have experience with measurement-based procedures, you should not think that your own research approach is the best in all cases.